GST 2.0: What the New Tax Regime Means for India’s Metal Industry


..
Pragati Tiwari
5-9-2025

The Goods and Services Tax reforms announced recently by the GST Council go beyond an update on tax rates. These reforms seek a structural recalibration of how the largest industrial sectors of India , metals, construction, and infrastructure will operate in the next ten years. Simplification of rates, tightening compliance, and realignment of the tax regime on major critical raw materials such as steel scrap and cement are expected to impact prices, working capital, and competitiveness, in effect, on the entire value chain.

This analysis studies the reforms from the vantage points of the industry of metals and infrastructure with emphasis on cost structures, procurement strategies, and long-term investment decisions.

1. The Core of the Reform Package

Two components stand out:

Rate Rationalisation: This will enhance predictive power for transactions by keeping slabs few and aligning most items under 5% or 18%. For construction, GST on cement and certain steel items has been reduced, which is a relief for an industry that has been seeking it for years.

Compliance Formalisation: The introduction of RCM on metal scrap and stringent reporting requirements is a decisive attempt by the authorities to root out informality in the recycling and raw material procurement chain. 

Together, these changes lower headline tax rates on critical inputs while pulling formerly informal segments into the tax net.

2. Implications for Project Economics

Since the infrastructure sector ranks among the strongest consumers of cement and steel, any such reduction coincides with a magnified effect on project viability.

Lower Input Costs: Reduction in GST on cement and certain grades of steel reduces construction costs on a direct basis. Estimated to lower overall project costing by 2-5%, based on material intensity.

Contractual Changes: Multi-year EPC and public infrastructure projects are to rework their Bills of Quantities (BOQ) to reflect these savings, unless there are pass-through provisions in the contract that would enable the benefit to be realized by the end-users more quickly. 

Inverted Duties Worries: Some sectors are still facing the inverted duty structure where inputs attract a higher GST than the final product, blocking credits. Until the refund mechanism is streamlined, that shall remain a constraining factor.

For developers, the reform offers relief, but the real efficiency gain will come from improved refund processes.

3. Scrap and Recycling: A New Compliance Landscape

Placing metal scrap inside the ambit of reverse charge drastically changes the procurement practices in the steel industry.

Shift in Tax Burden: Instead of the small and mostly unregistered dealers, the registered buyers viz., mills and foundries, are now required to pay GST, thereby, formalising the supply chain but increasing the administrative work. 

Traceability and Transparency: With time, this will lead to a decrease in grey-market scrap transactions and allow cleaner price benchmarks. 

Working-Capital Strain: Buyers had to pay GST upfront under RCM, while mid-sized players found this a liquidity issue, until streamlining of ITC took place. 

This gives big integrated players with digital procurement systems and working capital access a leg up, while some smaller traders may feel consolidation pressure.

4. Input Tax Credit: Still the Deciding Factor

While rate cuts get all the attention, Input Tax Credit (ITC) is what really matters for competitiveness.

Faster Refunds Needed: Where there are no fast refunds, the working capital of a business is locked up, negating by effect much of the relief that the lower GST rates offer.

Sector-Specific Complexities: In infrastructure work contracts and composite supply structures, proper classification is required for ITC eligibility. Thus, improper classification may cause cascading costs.

More definite ITC rules and an efficient refund mechanism will sell the benefits faster in the industries. 

5. Procurement and Tendering Strategies

Within procurement policies, GST rates are to be incorporated: 

Request for Repricing: Tender processes, from both public and private sectors, should in principle recognize any variation in costs brought about due to the changes in GST rates. EPC firms are obliged to consider the availability of their input tax credit prior to bidding.

Vendor Onboarding: Contracts with scrap suppliers require restructuring for RCM liabilities. This entails enhanced vendor KYC and compliance monitoring. 

Digitisation of Invoicing: With the greater focus laid on reporting accuracy, greater acceptance of e-invoicing will conversely limit any reconciliation risks and penalties.

Basically, procurement strategies should now weigh the choices between rate savings and compliance readiness.

6. Effects on Steel Pricing and Demand

With regard to the steel market, different effects of the reforms will be felt:

Demand Pull: With GST coming down on construction inputs, demand may stretch to clerically produced steel products for infrastructure.

Compliance Cost Pressures: Formalisation into scrap markets would mean a temporary hike in input costs for secondary steel producers. 

Margin Push: Integrated entities and big traders would be cushioned from payments of compliance costs, while smaller players would undergo margin compression.

At least for now, demand-side pull from construction may overshadow short-term compliance costs, thereby supporting steel prices positively. 

7. Long-Term Competitiveness and Sustainability

If these reforms accomplish their goal, these could be game-changing reforms. 

Formalisation of Recycling: By integrating the scrap transactions into the tax net, India makes its circular economy somewhat stronger and somewhat more aligned with global ESG norms.

Investment Attractiveness: Lesser tax volatility and a much better input transparency will make India as a location more attractive for investment, domestically and internationally, in steel and infrastructure.

Predictable Policy Environment: Long-term stability in indirect taxation is the key for capital allocation over projects with multi-decade horizons.

The reforms, therefore, are not just about current pricing but about improving the ecosystem’s long-term resilience.

8. Key Risks Ahead

There remain three big risks front and centre, notwithstanding the positives: 

Refund Delay: Liquidity will get affected if the time to process refunds is not shortened. 

Implementation Complexity: RCM, TDS, and TCS require much clarity through notifications to avoid ambiguity and disputes. 

Uneven Benefit Transmission: End-users may not feel the benefit of reduced GST on inputs without good enforcement.

These risks need to be managed by policy follow-ups and strong internal compliance. 

9. Practical Action Plan for Industry Players

Potentially, the numbered items below are of immediate relevance for entities operating in metals and infrastructure:

Cost Recalculation: The old style of costing projects and consolidating tender submissions needs to be updated with the new GST rates. 

Enforce Vendor Compliance: Onboard vendors for scrap into formal channels and enforce the issuance of GST-compliant invoices.

Upgrade ERP Systems: Ensure readiness to post RCM entries and enter correct HSN classifications. 

Rearrange Contracts: Include provisions related to tax-rate revision and compliance obligations.

Strengthen Tax Advisory Engagement: Regular consultations ensure that ITC claims are made correctly and minimise disputes. 

Conclusion

GST reforms are meant to deliberately tilt the balance towards lowering costs for infrastructure growth and formalising the recycling economy in metals. The balance of lower tax rates on inputs and stringent compliance on scrap transactions would generate opportunities and friction in the short term.

For industry stakeholders, success would mean adapting quickly: repricing of projects, digitisation of procurement, restructuring of supply chains. While refund delays and compliance challenges are testing times, the long-term outlook is bright. If adequately implemented, these reforms will put India’s metal and infrastructure sectors on the map in terms of transparency, competitiveness, and alignment with global best practices.